Multilease
    Lease and ERE

    Multilease • receive ERE revenue or wait?

    Multilease is substantively clear: the EAN owner receives the ERE revenue, but the employer may still factor that revenue into charging reimbursement.

    In short

    The EAN leads

    If you are the EAN owner, the ERE revenue belongs to you.

    Employer reimbursement sits next to it

    The practical discussion afterwards is about the size of the home-charging reimbursement.

    Knowledge article

    ERE-certificaten: alle info op een rij

    "If an employer pays a reimbursement for home charging, that amount should be based on the total cost of charging. That depends on any revenue coming from ERE certificates."

    Multilease • knowledge article about ERE certificates

    // The neutral view

    What applies to every lease driver

    Core rule for this page

    The owner of the EAN receives the ERE revenue. That is the legal starting point across all lease pages. The rest is about registration, reimbursement and agreements.

    For home charging, ERE legally follows the owner of the electricity connection (the EAN). That owner is entitled to the ERE revenue. In many lease situations that is simply the driver or household at the home address.

    That is the part to be crystal clear about: the right to the revenue sits with the EAN owner. The practical discussion starts afterwards, once an employer fully reimburses home charging and wants to revisit that reimbursement.

    Legal starting point

    The right follows the owner of the connection (the EAN). That EAN owner is entitled to the revenue, not automatically the employer or leasing company.

    Practical reality

    Whoever fully reimburses home charging may argue that ERE revenue affects the reimbursement per kWh. That is why alignment with the employer is sensible.

    Contract check

    Check whether your lease or employment policy already says anything about ERE or emission reduction units. If it says nothing, that does not change the legal starting point that the EAN owner receives the revenue.

    // Employer reimbursement

    Three scenarios that make the difference

    Variable electricity price reimbursed

    If your employer only reimburses a limited or variable electricity tariff, ERE is often extra revenue on top of that reimbursement.

    Full kWh price reimbursed

    If your employer pays the full home-charging cost, that reimbursement is more likely to be revisited once ERE starts paying out.

    Private lease

    With private lease the situation is the simplest. You are the EAN owner yourself and there is no employer trying to redesign the reimbursement.

    // Multilease's public stance

    What Multilease says publicly

    Multilease recognises that the EAN owner receives the revenue, but also stresses that employer reimbursement should stay aligned with total charging cost.

    Multilease says the revenue is paid to the person whose name is on the electricity connection. In most cases that is the driver.

    The page clearly states that an employer reimbursing home charging should look at the total charging cost, including any ERE income.

    So the message is not to wait, but to calculate realistically.

    // Joulo's stance

    Joulo's stance

    Joulo aligns closely with the Multilease line here: if you are the owner of the EAN, the ERE revenue belongs to you. Register for that revenue and at the same time acknowledge that it can affect the home-charging reimbursement paid by your employer.

    Right to the revenue

    If you are the owner of the EAN, the ERE revenue belongs to you. That also follows from Multilease's public explanation.

    Employer reimbursement

    Take the employer component seriously. That is where the real nuance sits in Multilease's story.

    Execution

    Write agreements down if your employer currently pays a high fixed reimbursement per kWh.

    // FAQ

    Frequently asked questions about Multilease and ERE

    // Source and disclaimer

    This page is an editorial analysis of public information from the named leasing company, supplemented with Joulo's practical interpretation. It is not legal or tax advice.

    Open original source